2 of 2
2
The Oscars.  How was last night?
Posted: 21 June 2007 11:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  69
Joined  2006-04-19
Mike Bonds - 21 June 2007 07:45 AM
Darke Raven - 20 June 2007 06:33 PM
Mike Bonds - 20 June 2007 01:15 PM
KenKRK - 20 June 2007 10:49 AM
Mike Bonds - 20 June 2007 06:50 AM

People are always downing Disney, but Disney proved that animation could be commercially viable.  If it wasn’t for Disney, we wouldn’t have the number of animation studios or feature length animation flicks we have today, IMO.

animation as family entertainment, sure, but when’s a major American animation studio gonna have the balls to approach animation the way Europe and Asia do? When’s someone gonna say, “hey, let’s make a sweeping animated sci-fi epic on par with live-action sci-fi films”? “Let’s make a pyschological thriller like Perfect Blue.”

Yes, but if even family-oriented animation had financially tanked, we’d never have this discussion.

I think we’re actually on the way there.  I didn’t like Sin City, but I think it’s an important bridge film between live-action and dramatic animation.  I think that film proved there was a market for animation that wasn’t family animation. 

I don’t know that the problem is actually production.  There are flicks out there in Europe and Asia, as you mention, even if they aren’t being made in Hollywood.  I think we’re more in search of a distributor with balls rather than a studio with balls.

If someone is waiting for family-oriented animation to tank it’s not happening. After all it should have tanked years ago when the worst drek in so called family entertainment was coming out and yet somehow maniac obsessed parental types were keeping it on life-support (until now when actually decent family fare began to roll out in mass quantities).

But it shouldn’t have to have tanked.
I say we can have an adult themed animation franchise in America if somebody climbs on the back of parental groups and censormongers and slaps a shut the hell up sticker on their mouths. Whatever happened to freedom of speech and expression? Is it a bumper sticker of pointlessness or does it actually MEAN something!

Yeah, we’ll never see American porn animation hit it high but at LEAST find me the American Miyazaki who is willing to make an intelligent engaging movie and isn’t making a movie just to market a ton of merchandise and appease the parental censormongers.
Is that too much to ask for?

I didn’t say that it tanked or that I wanted it to tank.  What I said was that if family animation had tanked, no one would take a chance on any other kind of animation and we wouldn’t therefore be having this discussion.

Regarding censorship, I think you’re laboring under a misunderstanding of the First Amendment.  I invite you to reread the First Amendment.  It says Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech.  It protects against unreasonable governmental interference with speech.  It doesn’t ensure that you will be held unaccountable by consumers for whatever you say.  That’s sort of the “Robbins and Sarandon” reinterpretation of the Constitution.  Just because you want to make say, anime porn, doesn’t mean that consumers don’t have a right to boycott or protest your company because they don’t approve of your product.  I also find it amusing that you’re so willing to demand that parental groups surrender their free speech rights so that other groups of which you approve can exercise theirs.  It sounds like you’re not so much against censorship, just censorship you don’t like.

As for the marketing bit being too much to ask, it is.  This isn’t an artists’ colony; it’s a multibillion dollar industry.  Art’s great, but when you ask a studio to plunk down $50 million to make a film, they’d really like to at least break even on it.  If you think these studios are just going to make that kind of investment for the sake of art, then your faith in the process is touching, if misplaced.

Speaking of tanked…
Actually the whole tanked thing had already happened.
Remember Titan A.E.? Remember anything from that particular animation studio after Titan A.E.? No? That’s because that studio which made Titan A.E. went under after the failing of Titan A.E. (an attempt at a more… well… “teen” movie and less kid movie).

Parental groups doesn’t have a speech, it’s mostly screeching and musclebound weight throwing (I have never heard any actual intellectual speech from the bullying parental groups).
And yes, I have no problem yanking their so called free speech because they have no problem taking my free speech (or mostly all my other freedoms).

As for marketing? Studios have no problem flushing $50 million down (or more) on dogs of a movies, otherwise we wouldn’t end up with the 50-70% of bleep we end up with in theaters on a yearly basis that should NEVER have been made the way they did (live action AND animated)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 June 2007 01:30 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  219
Joined  2006-08-02

Don’t believe everything you read on wikipedia.  The studio--a division of 20th Century Fox--actually did go on to release a straight-to-video film before Fox decided to get out of the animation business. It didn’t go bankrupt--in fact, the studio only ever made two theatrical releases, one of which was profitable.  It became clear that they couldn’t take on Disney like they’d hope to do.

Bluth was offered Ice Age and passed.  He had several profitable films through the years.  Titan A.E. failed because parents thought it was too mature for younger kids and teenagers saw it as too immature.  The film was decent--not great, decent--but the marketing was pretty poor.  It completely ignored the international market, where a film like that can make back a weak American box office showing.

Know why they spend $50 million on that crap?  Because they make the money back more often than not.  I’m not saying it’s right, but they’re in it for the money.

I have as much regard for your skills as a shadetree Constitutional scholar as I do for your skills as a shadetree film critic.  What you really mean is that parental groups don’t say what you like to hear.  “I’m for free speech so long as you say what I like” isn’t merely the epitome of juvenile hypocrisy, it’s actually a position your beloved Bush administration likes to take so often.  Maybe you’re not so far apart after all.

 Signature 

Gentlemen, you can’t fight in here! This is the War Room!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 June 2007 01:40 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  69
Joined  2006-04-19
Mike Bonds - 26 June 2007 01:30 PM

Don’t believe everything you read on wikipedia.  The studio--a division of 20th Century Fox--actually did go on to release a straight-to-video film before Fox decided to get out of the animation business. It didn’t go bankrupt--in fact, the studio only ever made two theatrical releases, one of which was profitable.  It became clear that they couldn’t take on Disney like they’d hope to do.

Bluth was offered Ice Age and passed.  He had several profitable films through the years.  Titan A.E. failed because parents thought it was too mature for younger kids and teenagers saw it as too immature.  The film was decent--not great, decent--but the marketing was pretty poor.  It completely ignored the international market, where a film like that can make back a weak American box office showing.

Know why they spend $50 million on that crap?  Because they make the money back more often than not.  I’m not saying it’s right, but they’re in it for the money.

I have as much regard for your skills as a shadetree Constitutional scholar as I do for your skills as a shadetree film critic.  What you really mean is that parental groups don’t say what you like to hear.  “I’m for free speech so long as you say what I like” isn’t merely the epitome of juvenile hypocrisy, it’s actually a position your beloved Bush administration likes to take so often.  Maybe you’re not so far apart after all.

I don’t use Wikipedia… I just mock it.
I love Mike, he reminds me of O’Reilly… he only likes you when you agree with him. But actually I like Mike because he has a strong opinion and isn’t afraid to share it (which is great).
Though Mike kinda got my position wrong (maybe).
According to O’Reilly most likely I may in fact be a “kool aid drinking hippie liberal”, not a Bush administration supporter. That’d imply a conservative viewpoint that I clearly don’t have.
Oh, well. Someone might as well seal this thread since there will be a fresh one made for the Academy Awards in 2008 anyway (controversy of the year being Michael Moore’s Sicko no doubt)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 June 2007 07:34 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 19 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  219
Joined  2006-08-02

I respect a strong viewpoint as well, but a true liberal would be for everyone’s free speech.  For that matter, a true conservative should be as well.  Protecting everyone’s constitutional rights should be a priority for both ends of the political spectrum.  If it was, things would be a damn sight better around here.  Consider me one of those last conservative people who think that the best way to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution isn’t to take a dump on it, like the present administration.

O’Reilly makes me want to puke. 

Liberalism isn’t a bad thing, it’s necessary in fact.  Liberalism based on hope always has a chance of success; liberalism based on guilt can never succeed.  I think that’s the big difference between liberals like FDR, Adlai Stevenson, and Jack Kennedy, versus the post 1960’s liberal leadership.

 Signature 

Gentlemen, you can’t fight in here! This is the War Room!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 June 2007 09:09 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 20 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  69
Joined  2006-04-19
Mike Bonds - 27 June 2007 07:34 PM

I respect a strong viewpoint as well, but a true liberal would be for everyone’s free speech.  For that matter, a true conservative should be as well.  Protecting everyone’s constitutional rights should be a priority for both ends of the political spectrum.  If it was, things would be a damn sight better around here.  Consider me one of those last conservative people who think that the best way to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution isn’t to take a dump on it, like the present administration.

O’Reilly makes me want to puke. 

Liberalism isn’t a bad thing, it’s necessary in fact.  Liberalism based on hope always has a chance of success; liberalism based on guilt can never succeed.  I think that’s the big difference between liberals like FDR, Adlai Stevenson, and Jack Kennedy, versus the post 1960’s liberal leadership.

Uh-huh… of course if protecting everyone’s constitutional rights was a priority for everyone… well, we wouldn’t be debating this topic now would we. Anyway it’s a moot point since clearly it’ll be a year or two before the next buzzworthy Anime movie worth talking about comes out in theaters.
This year it’s Ratatouille, Surf’s Up and Shrek the Third… unless there’s something I missed.

The most innovative award anyway is the independent animated shorts award, every year a new batch of innovative thought comes out and you see some most interesting projects every year. People should demand the yearly batch of nominees get a DVD release so everyone can see these people’s works. I for one would buy a copy if it was made available.

So then, to get away from the volitale topic of Anime in theaters on this thread (since it’s on another thread anyway) what does everyone think of the Animated Shorts category and it’s yearly batch of nominees? Any possibilities in that in terms of the future of animation from these creators?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 29 June 2007 07:52 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 21 ]
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  219
Joined  2006-08-02

I’d actually like to see the shorts.  Seems like it’s pretty difficult to catch them all together.

 Signature 

Gentlemen, you can’t fight in here! This is the War Room!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 29 June 2007 08:30 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 22 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1548
Joined  2006-04-06

Magnolia is releasing a DVD with all of them on one disc.

 Signature 

What real clown makes masturbation pills? - Andy, NOTLP

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 July 2007 04:51 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 23 ]
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  69
Joined  2006-04-19

Now that’s good news. I should look for it so I can review it.

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 2
2