PopSyndicate.com

   
2 of 2
2
Harry Potter and the Order of Suck
Posted: 31 July 2007 10:36 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  304
Joined  2006-04-07

The Great Gatsby can lick my ass.

Classics are rarely determined by the quality of the wordcraft inside. Rather, they’re determined more by the resultant fanfare that surrounds them.

 Signature 

Why haven’t you been listening to The Break Room?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 July 2007 11:26 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1650
Joined  2006-04-06

Are you kidding me?  Read the entire bloated series?  (Even fans have bitched about how excessive the stories are)  I hated the third book, why the hell would I want to read all seven books?  To torture myself?  I can speak with an educated opinion about what I know.  So far you haven’t really proven that Potter is great literature.  You’ve just argued that you don’t like my point of view.

I enjoyed Angels and Demons and The DaVinci Code so hugely popular books can be good.  I didn’t like Rowlings writing style.  I didn’t enjoy her character’s motivations.  At times they made no sense.  It felt very contrived through most of the book and the films echo these contrivances especially in the first four films. 

How do you figure that Lewis Carroll didn’t write Alice in Wonderland?

PS…your mom.

 Signature 

Follow me on Twitter

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 July 2007 11:37 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  304
Joined  2006-04-07

As an aside to the conversation, you just proved my point, as the DaVinci Code is one of the worst written books ever written. While the plot is interesting, the execution is awkward and stiff and quite laughable, especially when read aloud. That being said, it’s still going to end up a classic unfortunately. Rowling is no Dickens, to be sure, and she doesn’t even scratch the surface of someone like George R. R. Martin (but she still eats Dan Brown’s lunch when it comes to wordcraft). Nonetheless Rowling’s books are going to end up as classics.

There’s a tremendous difference between classics and great literature. Great literature is subjective.

 Signature 

Why haven’t you been listening to The Break Room?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 July 2007 11:48 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 19 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1650
Joined  2006-04-06

DaVinci Code will be forgotten.  It’s total pop trash that hit a nerve.  I agree that Rowling is a better writer than Brown.  He’s not that great of a writer.  Sadly, his plot have become the standard of adventure books these days. 

Uylsses is considered to be the best book of the 20th Century but just try to read it.  It’s a beating.

 Signature 

Follow me on Twitter

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 July 2007 11:53 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 20 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  188
Joined  2007-03-01

Long ago when galaxies were young, the stars in their cores were very closely packed. Star collisions and mergers occurred, giving rise to a single massive black hole (MBH) with perhaps 106 to 109 Mo. Gas from the galaxy’s interstellar medium, from a cannibalized galaxy, or from a star that strays too close, falls onto the MBH. As in X-ray binary star systems, an accretion disk forms, emitting huge amounts of light across the electromagnetic spectrum (infrared to gamma-rays). The MBH plus accretion disk produces the phenomena seen in active galactic nuclei (AGN). Below you see optical and radio images of the active galaxy NGC 4261. The central object, accretion disk, and lobes are all visible.  The different types of AGN are variations on this theme. Many galaxies today (including our Galactic center??) may have a quiet MBH which happens not to have recently accreted gas. Seyfert galaxies have accretion onto a moderate-mass MBH, while the more luminous quasi-stellar objects (i.e. quasars) have accretion onto a high-mass MBH.  In ~10% of the AGN, the MBH + accretion disk somehow produce narrow beams of energetic particles and magnetic fields, and eject them outward in opposite directions away from the disk. These are the radio jets, which emerge at nearly the speed of light. Radio galaxies, quasars, and blazars are AGN with strong jets, which can travel outward into large regions of intergalactic space. Many of the apparent differences between types of AGN are due to our having different orientations with respect to the disk. With Blazars and Quasars, we are looking down the jet. For Seyferts, we are viewing the jet broadside.  Consider NGC 4151, a spiral galaxy 15 Mpc away. Photographs by Carl Seyfert in the 1940s showed a very bright point-like nucleus. Its spectrum is very unusual: in addition to continua + absorption lines from normal stars, Seyfert galaxy nuclei have very strong emission lines. Some are common lines (e.g. H-alpha, H-beta) but others are weird (e.g. twice-ionized oxygen lines), requiring hot gas far out of equilibrium. The lines are very broad, requiring that the gas be Doppler shifted in all directions up to ~20,000 km/s. The nuclei vary in brightness on timescales of months, requiring them to be < 1 parsec in size. The total luminosity can be equivalent to 1010 Lo! Later in the 1940s, astronomers began scanning the skies with radio telescopes. They found strange radio structures on opposite sides of radio galaxies, plus a tiny source of radio emission at the nucleus. The nuclei of these radio galaxies shoot out narrow beams of extremely energetic electrons and magnetic fields, producing radio synchrotron radiation. The radio components include: the compact core at the galaxy nucleus, jets, lobes, and a hot spot where the jet slams into the interstellar medium. . . . . .

PS. . . SUCK IT!

 Signature 

PaperBag Radio
PaperBag TV
MySpace

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 July 2007 12:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 21 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1650
Joined  2006-04-06

You know what they say…give a retarded monkey a typewriter and eventually he’ll be able to write a Harry Potter novel.

PS…loser!

 Signature 

Follow me on Twitter

Profile
 
 
Posted: 31 July 2007 12:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 22 ]
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  85
Joined  2007-03-15

WHOOOOO!!

Astro Physics gets me HOT!  LOL

 Signature 

http://www.paperbagradio.com

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 2
2
 
‹‹ NOMINATED!!!!!!!!!      THE VOTING IS OPEN! ››




Archive

Syndicate

Copyright