Stefan - 28 July 2006 04:09 PM
So The Sunday Mail put together a list of the 50 movies you need see before you die.
http://www.sundaymail.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=17431935&method=full&siteid=64736&headline=50-films-to-see-before-you-die--name_page.html
I love a list and I love compairing my taste with someone else’s taste so how many of them have you seen and which titles should be on the list and which shouldn’t?
1 Apocalypse Now
2 The Apartment
3 City of God
4 Chinatown
5 Sexy Beast
6 2001: A Space Odyssey
7 North by Northwest
8 A Bout de Souffle
9 Donnie Darko
10 Manhattan
11 Alien
12 Lost in Translation
13 The Shawshank Redemption
14 Lagaan: Once Upon A Time in India
15 Pulp Fiction
16 Touch of Evil
17 Walkabout
18 Black Narcissus
19 Boyzn the Hood
20 The Player
21 Come and See
22 Heavenly Creatures
23 A Night at the Opera
24 Erin Brockovich
25 Trainspotting
26 The Breakfast Club
27 Hero
28 Fanny and Alexander
29 Pink Flamingos
30 All About Eve
31 Scarface
32 Terminator 2
33 Three Colours: Blue
34 The Royal Tenen-baums
35 The Ladykillers
36 Fight Club
37 The Searchers
38 Mulholland Drive
39 The Ipcress File
40 The King of Comedy
41 Manhunter
42 Dawn of the Dead
43 Princess Mononoke
44 Raising Arizona
45 Cabaret
46 This Sporting Life
47 Brazil
48 Aguirre: The Wrath of God
49 Secrets and Lies
50 Badlands
Pretension, thy name is the Sunday Mail.
There are some great movies on this list, but there are major head scratchers on here too, at least for me. I’ll never understand the fascination people have with 2001 and David Lynch.
First, 2001. Now, don’t get me wrong; 2001 revolutionized the way audiences thought about the way science fiction should look. It was a special effects milestone. But it’s a screenwriting millstone. It’s just a plotless, boring film. In Kubrick’s defense, I actually read 4 of these books trying to figure out what’s the heck was really going on, and Arthur C. Clarke didn’t give him much in the way of a solid story to go on. As cool as 2001 looks, it’s just a terrible piece of story telling. The notion of a character study performed on a computer might have been some antidote to the slow, plodding pace, but that storyline is underdeveloped like most everything else here. The ending resolves nothing whatsoever and doesn’t leave you caring any more about Bowman or HAL than you did when you walked in the theater.
David Lynch.....where to begin? The master of the nearly plotless mess. Despite the fact that I love a good lesbian scene as much as the next guy, Mulholland Drive was terrible. It was literally about nothing, but who’s surprised by that? Remember Eraserhead? How about Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me? Or Blue Velvet? Or Wild at Heart? Talk about storyectomies. And Lynch should never be forgiven for managing to completely destroy Dune. What is it about Lynch that captivates? His movies are so obtuse, only he can understand them, and I’m not even sure of that. It’s not that I’m too big of a philistine to understand them; there’s just nothing to understand. It’s a series of images, then Fin.
I think that videotape from The Ring was actually directed by David Lynch. Maybe if you could die from watching his stuff critics would eventually stop singing his praises. Or go extinct.