About E.M. Effingham

Location: Missouri

Occupation: Author

Bio: E.M. Effingham/Sara Ann Denson authored "Christmas Turtles" which received five stars from the Midwest Book Review last year. Catch her Amazon Author Connect Blog: Confessions of an Author's First Year of Marketing.

Posts: 25

More from this author

The Winds of Asharra by R. Leigh

Books: 2 comments: 05/08/2008

By E.M. Effingham

image

The Winds of Asharra, Volume 1: First-Flight heinously illustrates the importance of the slush pile.

Have you ever read the book The First Five Pages by Noah Lukeman?  How about The Art Of Punctuation by the same author?  R. Leigh certainly hasn’t.

As a big fan of Sci-Fi/Fantasy, I took this assignment, eagerly looking forward to traipsing through a new world.  Unfortunately, I kept tripping over the missed placed quotation marks, periods, and commas.  Then I fell into potholes left by missing words.  Here is a great example of why punctuation is important, not to mention the importance of a simple grammar check program.

When a manuscript is not edited, the reader has to constantly think about the craft of writing instead of getting swept away by the story.  It is like taking an afternoon drive through the mountains on a fall day.  If you follow a well-paved road, you can look out over the valleys and enjoy sweeping vistas.  If the road is full of potholes, you have to keep your eyes on the road, carefully dodging, slowing down, and speeding up.  It just isn’t enjoyable.

Liquid Logixx, Dallas, Texas

Let’s stop the car, get out and look at the vistas before I up-chuck on my floorboard.  I still have criteria besides punctuation to gage a story’s value and sometimes a great plot is worth a bumpy drive, or a call to your department of transportation, i.e. the publisher.

First of all, plot development:  Does the author put the main characters into a predicament that they themselves have to resolve?  No. The main characters are magically pulled into another world and are immediately okay with that.  They are not frightened, confused, or even dazed.  Every once in awhile they decide maybe they should find a way home, they even half-heartedly look for a way home, but they clearly-from the get-go- want to stay forever.

Here’s a few other basics of writing.  Is there a main, over-arching conflict to carry the reader through?  No, a few temporary conflicts developed here and there, but mostly the author just bragged on the world he created.  Does the reader understand the rules of the world created by the author and does the author stick to those rules to create suspense?  No.  I will offer one brownie point, however, since the author did manage to invent another world, albeit he repeated whole phrases of description throughout.

I’m not sure how, but R. Leigh managed to write in a style more indicative of documentary work for children, rather than a suspenseful Sci-Fi journey.  This was disturbing, given the fact that every single character in Asharra was stark naked and at the same time extremely boring.

Boredom reigned supreme because the author broke a cardinal rule of writing:  Show, Don’t Tell.  Cardinal Rule #1 for great writing.  The Winds of Asharra may have utilized erotica for shock value, but for every documentary-styled sex scene, there were five pages, five pothole ridden pages, of philosophizing.  The preaching went on and on and on using excessive adjectives without even illustrations.  Sometimes, whole sentences were repeated in the same paragraph three or four times with only slightly different wording.  At least the sermon would have ended if I had walked into a church and sat for an hour.  Sometimes I forgot which character was musing since all of them seemed to hold the exact same viewpoints to match the author’s philosophies.

Do yourself a favor, read Hemmingway, Herbert, or Voltaire.  Even if you stare at the original language of Voltaire, you’ll get more out of it than reading The Winds of Asharra by R. Leigh.  Usually, I loan out the books I read.  This one is headed to the recycling bin.

Additional Comments by Reviewer:  After baffling over how a manuscript could be so grossly edited, I checked out the publisher of this manuscript.  Outskirts Press is a POD publisher for completely self-published books.  I did a rough calculation, but it looks to me as if this author would have paid at least $2,000 for publishing this 600 plus page book.  That basic package would not have included editing but would have included a galley copy. 

A galley copy is the copy a writer looks over before s/he allows the manuscript to be published and sent out to reviewers like me.  It is the last chance for the author to go over the printed product with a fine tooth comb, the last chance to ensure there aren’t any mistakes in the printing of the book. With a reputable publisher, this is usually the moment the author sits back, reads over the book with a glass of wine, and cherishes the moment.  Outskirts Press, however, states that 25 minor editing changes comes with the “package.” After 25 minor edits, they charge 49 cents per minor edit.  If there are over 100 minor edits, the author is charged $50/hour for someone else to make these changes.  If the author orders a second galley copy to make sure the publisher got the edits right, then the author is charged another $50 and they cycle begins again.

Although I am not saying this happened, a self-publish press could easily rip people off by printing a galley copy chocked full of typos, deliberately ignoring a perfectly good, well-edited digital copy from the author.  Then the dissappointed author would have to hand over hundreds of dollars more in order to make sure his/her book went out to reviewers like me without obvious errors. 

As I said, I’m not saying this is the case, but I must say that there were extremely inane errors in every paragraph of this manuscript.  My own editor here at Pop Syndicate called it inexcusable when I gave him just two pages of examples.  Author R. Leigh would have had to pay an editor thousands of dollars just to make sure the quotation marks were all in the right spot. Personally, I certainly won’t be reading any more books from this company because I hate wasting my time.  The low star rating I have given the book still reflects the poor quality of the plot and execution of the story, but I am disstressed by the possibility an aspiring author has been fleeced.  I had to say something regarding this company’s editing fees. 

1
Posted by Chris Kline on 05/09/2008, 12:17 PM

You’re right, Outskirts Press is the fastest-growing full-service POD publisher because we offer the greatest control and flexibility over pricing, appearance, and content. We offer a variety of services for authors, including optional editing. With the level of control we grant our authors comes their responsibility to produce the book as they see fit.

It’s true that this author chose not to edit the book before publication even though we offer very economical editing services to subsidize them. We strongly encourage all our authors to edit their books (for the very reason to avoid reviews such as this), but unfortunately, some authors cannot afford to, or do not see the value. That said, stating that you empirically refuse to read other books by a company on the basis of one book is like saying you will no longer watch HBO because you hate the Sopranos. It doesn’t make any sense.

It is bordering on libel, however, to suggest that a publisher would purposefully insert errors into a book simply to force authors into paying more for galley revisions. If you have read the self-published books from any of our competitors, you realize that nearly all of them leave the content (including the editing) in the hands of the author. And if you’ve edited any manuscripts at the pre-publication stage in the past, you realize that most books need substantial editing.  Manuscripts that are not edited will often have many, many errors. There would be no reason for the publisher to insert any new ones. You failed to mention that Outskirts Press always authors have another option to provide a completely corrected re-draft at the proofing stage, if their number of revisions climb too high. Likewise, your assumptions toward this author’s cost are flat-out wrong. We are one of the most economic and value-based POD publishers around. Please be more responsible in your future blog postings.

Regards,
Chris Kline
Director of Author Support
http://outskirtspress.com


Posted by E.M. Effingham on 05/10/2008, 05:33 PM

The reviewer acknowledges that I have not spoken with the author and do not know the contract details that were settled upon. My rough estimates were based on the prices listed on Outskirts Press website in comparison to the number of pages and an estimate of errors in the book. After checking with Writer Beware, I was informed that charging for corrections is a standard in the self-publishing industry, not a practice unique to this publisher. Although several authors are challenging the industry practice in court, it is ultimately the author’s responsibility to be familiar with the PDF format and to read the contract. I have also not investigated any claims against Outskirts Press or even if there are any complaints.  If you would like to keep track of this debate within the publishing industry, you can check out The Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America site which hosts Writer Beware:

http://www.sfwa.org/beware/printondemand.html

They keep track of complaints by authors who have actually been through the process.  (I have not been self-published.) They also keep track of court cases currently pending.


Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: