04/04/2008
Comic Books:: 4 comments: by Jamison Sacks
but it really doesn’t…
It happens. Something comes out, a movie, a comic, a book, whatever, but everyone buys into it. It becomes the’ New Big Thing’. They all tell you how incredible they found it. They cannot stop going on about the story, the characters, and the imagery, whatever. So, you think ‘wow, I have got to pick that up.’ You give it a chance. When you finish with the ‘New Big Thing’, you feel let down somehow. It did not live up to the hype and even though you understand how people could get into the story, the characters, the imagery, whatever, you find yourself wondering what they saw that you do not. That about sums up my Random Purchase for the week: Kick-Ass #2.
Kick-Ass tells the tale of an extremely average boy living in NYC. The boy is nothing special. One day he proceeds to put on a superhero costume and go patrol the streets of NYC. He promptly gets the beating of a lifetime after trying to stop some vandals. Kick-Ass #2 opens up with his 4 months or so of hospital stay and his endless ruminations about he should do now. Of course, once out of the hospital and off the crutches, he puts the costume right back on and heads out again, only this time with a little more modicum of success.
I think the hyper-violence depicted in the book causes me to find it a bit much. I should be used to that from a Mark Millar story. Millar writes in a very cinematic way. I cannot really fault his style. He usually shows honest emotions and thought processes from characters. I think the idea of the ordinary man (or boy) picking up the cause and trying to make things better is great story idea. The character he came up with though? I find myself completely unsympathetic to him. Here we have a 16(ish) year old boy, who probably weighs less than Kate Moss, going out and trying to patrol? Then after nearly dying, doing it again? Am I just supposed to believe the kid lacks in the mental faculties department? Because, honestly, doing that in NYC, with only a couple of nightsticks seems damn stupid to me. Even though he finds himself moderately successful the second time out, how will explain needing to go to the hospital again, since the gang bangers used him as a punching bag.
Ahh, the ‘villains’ of the piece. I am slightly curious to know whether or not in Millar’s script for John Romita JR. (co-creator and artist) if he actually specified that everyone doing something wrong in the comic should be black or Latino. I found that to be a bit disparaging honestly. No mention of where the boy and his father live in NYC (at least in this issue), so perhaps it makes sense in that context. I am just over the image that in big cities you have roving bands of minorities vandalizing and attacking everyone they see in broad daylight. Oh, wait, upon further inspection it was at least dusk or nighttime. They do show a few streetlights on and some lights on in windows. I had to look for these clues though, because the coloring makes me think that it is not even dark out yet. I find that takes away from the impact of the fight. John Romita Jr.’s depiction of the fight will definitely cause the more squeamish folks to pass up this book. Blood, bone, and gore abound.
I suppose, when it comes down to it, I really should not have been that surprised by this book. The title is ‘Kick-Ass.’ The cover even says ‘Sickening Violence: Just The Way You Like It!’ Millar likes his violence. Romita Jr. draws big, flashy pages with great detail. I think I am just used to getting a little bit more out of what they write/draw. Like I said, the concept sounds interesting; I just do not find any empathy in the execution. Perhaps writing/drawing Kick-Ass keeps them from torturing small animals? Or fans at cons? Hrmm…. Anyone know how big these guys are? Should I be worrying about them coming after me now?
Kick-Ass #2
Writer: Mark millar
Penciller: John Romita Jr.
Inks: Tom Palmer
Colors: Dean White
Letters: Chris Eliopoulos
Posted by JRjr on 04/05/2008, 10:04 AM
As with all my work, I am an equal oppourtunity portrayer of crime. I come from a very colorful neighborhood and ALWAYS used every race, creed and religion, in my work. I’ve been in the business for thirty years and have been consistent with the realities of streets, people and the surroundings. I find it interesting that there has never been a comment, by you or anyone, about the fact that the majority of thugs and criminals are caucasian, or that my work covers a huge range of people. Or, that there are crimes within minority communities and by minorities to other minorities. Another point. NYC is, crime-wise, to the point that it is the safest large city in the country. There are cities that are half the size and have more crime. This series is FICTION. If it depicts moments and time of a less than humane nature then it should be considered in that light.
Speaking of light….I guess crime only occurs at night.
reality JRjr
Posted by Jamison Sacks on 04/05/2008, 02:34 PM
“If it depicts moments and time of a less than humane nature then it should be considered in that light. ”
Okay, I can concede to that point. Perhaps I was looking at it from too much of a literal perspective. I live in Manhattan. In fact, I live in East Harlem. The idea that something of this magnitude could happen in the middle of the day without anyone even trying to help or any mention or suggestion of police was a bit of a disturbing idea. Entertainment media in general (books, movies, tv, comics) seem to depict NYC as such a crime ridden area that it tends to feel worn out some.
as for the light.. the coloring does not depict a night scene that the visual cues are trying to enforce. It just seems a mismatch.
Posted by James Donnelly on 04/05/2008, 03:50 PM
I’m glad that someone else reviewed this issue this week because I was hoping for a fresh perspective. That being said, I was really shocked to see such an extremely opposite point of view. I loved this issue. I think that this book is terrific even with the hype. And I thought that some of the things that you don’t like are the things that work. Is this kid maybe a little off? Is the book over-the-top in its depiction of violence? Gleefully so. I know that it’s cool to dig Millar since he can do mainstream and independent work, but I’ve been a fan of Millar since he started working with fellow Scot Grant Morrison on Aztek and this book is more of a testament to his talent. And I’ve always loved JR Jr. So I’ve gotta keep giving it up to these guys. Still, despite this polarization of opinions, great thought-provoking review, sir.
Posted by Jamison Sacks on 04/05/2008, 08:39 PM
That’s the interesting thing about reviews. They are mostly opinion. They are about feelings the reviewer recieves from reading the book. It’s all in how you see things, I suppose.